In The Science of Miracles, you will discover paradigm-shattering revelations that demonstrate why we are not limited by the Laws of physics and biology as we know them today, and why our DNA is a code that we can change and upgrade by choice! The implications of these discoveries are vast, powerful, and for some, challenging. They show us, beyond a reasonable doubt, that we can reverse disease, redefine aging, create peace between nations, and evan change reality itself through the focused power of belief and heart-based emotion. It is these seemingly miraculous abilities that create the life-affirming joys in our lives that become the reality of our world. They are all based on the same principle!

Segnala presso:

What type of change? I believe that is up to us to set the course. I also believe that this journey is a journey that has to be done alone as we need to discover for ourselves what it is our true contribution to this world.

Where will you stand? Aside the majority of normal people who still have the hope and dream to make earth a better place or will you allow a tyrannic economic leadership to silence you and brainwash you so that you think that the world is evil and that we need to surrender our freedom… to them?

As these movies will be out soon, I believe it’s good to see what can be ahead of us…

Have a look and think!

Segnala presso:

The reason that moved me to write this, is an article published by the New York Times signed by Jeff Johnson and syndicated in Singapore by The Straits Times titled “Bouncing Baby Bailout“.

What the writer suggests is, basically, to use “babies” as collateral in order to get loans that, when the babies will grow, will pay for their parents. He called this “Reverse Inheritance”. Of course, when their time comes, they might also be entitled for this “Reverse Inheritance” by using their own children.

The logic is clear: banks will not want to take risks having properties as collateral as we might decide to surrender back to the banks who will obviously have difficult time to place it back on a market that has no more money… but people are different.

Children will have the most valuable and only true resource that can produce real wealth: “time”. Moreover, if we do a proper analysis of the consequences of such scheme, within 2-3 generations we will have a generation of slaves that, without having anything to do with it, they might have to work to pay the debt of their ancestors. What a clever scheme would this be for banks to ensure their loans!

Mr Johnson says, between other things:

- “I certainly expect my family to grow closer. My 4-year-old and I are stuck in the archaic roles of child and daddy. But with the prospect of a large R.I. loan, we’ll become partners”

- “I, as the boy’s parent, would then be entitled to a Reverse Inheritance loan of $50,000 (or 10 percent of the earnings from the aforementioned five-year period). And my child will simply earn $10,000 less per year (plus interest) over that same period, which is thankfully much, much, much farther down the road. (If he has children by then, he’ll qualify for a Reverse Inheritance loan, of course, and his wallet won’t feel a thing.)”

This is the classic drug pusherr kind of talking… “taste it… you can stop any time..” and then you are hooked! Worse, as people should not do anything other than having kids their sense of responsibility will be close to zero. Mmmm… thinking of going for a cruise dear, what about having a kid?

- “Reverse Inheritance loans would initiate spending in every sector. Couples of every stripe will hurl cash at adoption agencies, fertility specialists and surrogates. Singles will spend money on dental work and tanning, as well as lessons in dance and etiquette, in order to get their piece of the pie. Parents will devote vast sums to stimulating their child’s earning potential with “Baby Einstein” DVDs and 64-packs of crayons — stimulating the economy in the process.”

Let’s take the stand for that 4 year-old, let’s all become that 4 year-old. Shall we??

First I advise you to watch this clip and imagine how that parent can “partner” with a 4 year old…

As that 4 year-old, my advise to such a dad who was so bloody irresponsible to put me on this world without working his butt out unwilling to take his own responsibilities would be to either leave me or jump off the cliff. That boy (why only boys??) would live his life in grief, maybe not living a wealthy life, but he will live FREE. Not bound (slave) to a debt he did not do anything to begin with.

This looks too much the precursor of a society of the old Chinese type where kids are seen more like a commodity rather than for what they truly are: blessings from God (for those who believe it). Remnants of this archaic mindset are still very common in Asia and especially rooted in Chinese culture (the past?) whereby sex selection has brought China almost on its knees due to the severe imbalance between the number of men and women.

I would like to just discard this article as utterly ridiculous if we do not consider from which “altar” this is coming from… from a publication that is very close to the heart (and wallet) on one of the (actually “THE”) richest and most powerful family of bankers in the world. Do we need to name them??

Their approach if very evident in this article. This is used to test the public opinion: testing if the american society, and then the world, are desperate enough to accept this new scheme. What if people complain? Well no harm done… it was just a writer’s opinion.

Open your eyes people…

Segnala presso:

What no such thing as universal human rights? What? Are we kidding? I then politely replied to the forum, we’ll see if my letter will be published… in any case here we go…

I am referring to Tan Ruo Yu ’s letter published on Tuesday titled “No such thing as human rights”.

He claims that the stance to defend human rights is “rigid, insensitive and naive” but he is ignoring that what lays behind that stance is a history of thousands of years of cultural, philosophical, religious and legal development that find today the highest expression in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

This is something that should be carefully read and understood before making any comment.

Human rights ARE NOT “something” we could be entitled (following the mood of the reigning lord of the moment) but a “natural birth right”. What should be debated is not IF to apply them but HOW to do so.

Yes it is “naive and idealistic” that nations would go all the way to make sure those right are applied.

In this Singapore has actually an advantage having followed, since independance, some “naive and idealistic” ideas steered by Lee Kwan Yew.

He actually used the same exact terms when he talked about how others saw Singapore’s effort for survival.

Without those naive and idealistic ideas, you can be sure Singapore would have not been what it is today.

Let’s not forget, however, that with the evolution of a society the needs of people evolve too.

What was first the need, to guarantee food, work and shelter for survival, is now becoming the need to guarantee, between other things, justice, freedom and education.

For what I see, Singapore has the advantage of being still “on-the-ball”: the spirit is still strong and a vision is still there. Now would be indeed the time to consolidate what has been done while making plans for the future.

Freedom goes hand-in-hand with respect. The rule I live by and I will raise my kids is that: “My freedom ends where yours begins”.

The job of any government is to ensure that this a balance is kept (and preserved) in the society so that its citizens may enjoy freedom but not at other’s expense. Is this really too much to ask?

When in a society is strong the need for change, the society has always found a way to express it following the only two ways known in recorded history: evolution or revolution.

The job of any government is to keep the vision and ensure that the natural aspirations of people are met, that nobody is left behind without becoming complacent and arrogant.

That has always been the beginning of the end. Always.

Segnala presso: